Connecting past, present, and future: A corpus-based study of Grammatical Cohesion in Budget Discourse
Keywords:
English for Specific Purposes, Politico-Financial Budget Statements, Register Studies, Financial Discourse, Political DiscourseAbstract
Cohesion in politico-financial registers, such as budget statements, remains terra incognita, although it is crucial in shaping the rhetorical structure of these documents. Cohesive devices are key indicators in strengthening financial arguments and shaping people’s understanding of fiscal policies. Despite their significance, studies on cohesion in budget statements remain limited. This corpus-assisted study thus examines the discourse functions of grammatical cohesion in politico-financial budget statements using Ghana’s 2024 Budget Statement as data. The analysis was guided by Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) cohesion framework. The findings revealed that references were used to establish the Finance Minister’s authority and maintain thematic continuity, while substitution was used to enhance textual variation and avoid monotonous sentences. Additionally, conjunctions were used to structure economic narratives by establishing additive relations, signalling causality, contrasting financial outcomes, and indicating temporal sequences between economic events. The findings offer a deeper understanding of the functions of grammatical cohesion in a politico-financial register, such as budget statements.
References
Ahmad, T. M., & Abdullah, N. A. S. 2021. A Case Study on Social Media Analytics for Malaysia Budget. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(10), 579-585.
Ahmed, S., Mahmood, R., Arif, S., & Shakir, A. 2014. A critical discourse analysis of Pakistani and Indian budget speeches. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(7), 155-161.
Akoto, O.Y., 2023. Role Switch in Lecturer-Students Classroom Interaction: A Corpus-Based Study of Self-Referential Personal Pronouns. Corpus Pragmatics, 7(2), 121-147.
Akoto, O.Y., 2020. Individualities in the referents of I, we, and you in academic lectures across disciplines. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 1-14.
Akoto, O.Y. and Afful, J.B.A., 2021. What languages are in names? Exploring the languages in church names in Ghana. Athens Journal of Philology, 8(1), 37-52.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge:
Gopang, I. B., & Bughio, F. A. (2015). Pakistani Budget 2013-2014: A Critical Discourse Analysis. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 40-46. government study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(7), 564-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v2n1p40
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. Longman.
Kaur, R., Kaur, R., Singh, M., & Ranjan, S. (2020). Twitter sentiment analysis of the Indian union budget 2020. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(4), 2282-2288.
MacDonald, E. A. 2022. Constructing the social in the fiscal: A discourse analysis of Irish budget speeches [Doctoral dissertation, Technological University Dublin].
MacDonald, E., O'Rourke, B., & Hogan, J. 2019. Visions of the Future in Budgetary Discourse [Paper presentation]. Society for the Advancement of Socio-economics (SASE) Annual Conference: The New School, New York City, USA.
Nunan, D. 1993. From Learning-Centeredness to Learner-Centeredness. Applied Language Learning, 4(1), 1-18. https://eric.ed.gov/id=EJ477796
Shakeel, M., & Karwal, V. 2016. Lexicon-based sentiment analysis of Indian Union Budget 2016–17. [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSC) Noida, India.
Swales, J. (2005). Attended and unattended ‘‘this’’ in academic writing: A long and unfinished story. ESP Malaysia, 11(1), 1-15.
Thompson, G. 2004. Introducing functional grammar, 2nd ed. Edward Arnold.
Thompson, N. (2015). New liberalism, new language? The use of collectivist concepts in the budget speeches of 1893–95 and 1906–14. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 2(1), 1071689. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2015.1071689
Wildavsky, A. B. 1974. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Little Brown.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Osei Yaw Akoto, Razak Latif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Ghana Journal of Linguistics is published by the Linguistics Association of Ghana, P. O. Box LG 61, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
LAG Email: linguisticsgh@gmail.com. Website: http://www.laghana.org
GJL Email: gjl@laghana.org Website: http://www.laghana.org/gjl
© Linguistics Association of Ghana and individual authors, 2023.